Regulators often seek to spur the adoption of green technologies (such as electric vehicles) using one of two financial subsidies: lowering the upfront cost of buying the technology (such as an electric vehicle subsidy) and lowering the marginal cost of using the technology (such as an electricity tariff subsidy). This project evaluates how the economic characteristics of a setting or technology determine which of these is more effective in terms of tons of CO2 abated per dollar of government expenditure. Between August—December 2025 we implemented a randomized study with 2,100 households in Nakuru County, Kenya to study this problem among induction stoves in Kenya, which abate approximately the same amount of CO2 per year as the switch from a gasoline vehicle to an electric vehicle. We randomly allocated loan access, fixed cost subsidies, and marginal cost subsidies to study the relative impacts on electric stove adoption. We collected more than 5 million measurements of induction stove usage (15-minute data, in Watts, for more than 600 induction stove buyers), more than 100 million temperature measurements to record charcoal cookstove usage (2-minute data, in Celsius, for more than 1,700 charcoal stove users), and more than 20,000 loan instalment payments. Over the next 12 months we will analyze these data to understand the impact of subsidy dollars on fuel…Read More

